Call this one a brilliant thought that I had in the shower the other day.
There are plenty of anti-stigma campaigns related to mental health. In many cases, the goal of these campaigns is simple, noble and necessary: to defeat “mental health challenges in the workplace and at home.” This is vitally important work.
There’s good news related to that though. In many areas, anti-stigma campaigns have already done their job. For example, a poll taken in my home state of Pennsylvania (March 2017) shows high levels of comfort in terms of working with someone with a mental illness, a vast improvement over previous levels. While there is still a long way to go, this poll shows significant movement in the area of mental illness.
I was thinking about this poll the other day, and it had me thinking: What does anti-stigma really mean? Obviously we need to continue to work on critical areas like discrimination and access to healthcare, but I’d argue there’s more than that.
My argument is this: The most powerful sense of stigma is self-stigma.
Consider this 2012 article, which describes self-stigma as when “patients agree with and internalize social stereotypes,” resulting in:
•Patients often think that their illness is a sign of character weakness or incompetence.
•Patients develop feelings of low self-esteem and become less willing to seek or adhere to treatment.
• Patients anticipate that they will be discriminated against, and to protect themselves they limit their social interactions and fail to pursue work and housing opportunities.
As a result, patients find themselves less willing to seek treatment and social support, leading to lower rates of recovery.
This realization has had me rethinking how I approach the notion of anti-stigma campaigns. Of course they should be focused on ensuring that all of society views people with mental illness not as sick freaks who are weak, but as real people suffering from real disorders that can be treated like any physical illness. I want to push society to a place where all of us – those with mental illness and those without – view people who are suffering from a mental illness the same way that someone views a cancer patient. No one who suffers from a mental illness should do so in fear, shame or silence. They should talk about their therapy appointments the same way a cancer patient discusses chemo or someone with a broken leg discusses physical therapy.
I suppose, then, that what I am saying is this: Anti-stigma campaigns shouldn’t just address societal stigma. They should address self-stigma as well.
As always, I welcome your thoughts – am I onto something here? More importantly, have you found any anti-stigma campaigns that fulfill what I am describing? Let me know what in the comments!
3 thoughts on “What anti-stigma really means”
Reblogged this on Read After Burnout and commented:
I agree totally. Not beating yourself up for your challenges is the essence of my blog. Good job.
That does NOT mean we stop “stopping stigma” from outside ourselves however. Arming ourselves with a sentence or two to say in its presence helps, of course, but the very easiest best thing to say when stigma is aimed your way personally is, “Ouch!” (looking the right in the eyes)
If they defend or deflect vs. apologizing, say simply, “Stop it!” (again, looking the right in the eyes)
Finally, walk away.
It’s for US, not for them, but if enough of us actually DO that, it can’t help but have an effect. Silence is complicit.
(Madelyn Griffith-Haynie – ADDandSoMuchMORE dot com)
ADD/EFD Coach Training Field founder; ADD Coaching co-founder
“It takes a village to transform a world!
Mike, my confused blog tries to make sense of it all. It helped me pull through.